USDA defends climate fund use amid criticism

USAgNet - 03/07/2024

The USDA found itself at the center of a heated debate. A report from the Environmental Working Group suggested that most USDA funds intended for climate-smart agriculture were not effectively targeting practices that mitigate climate change. Specifically, it highlighted that only a small portion of the Environmental Quality Incentives Program's budget was used for cover cropping, a proven emission-reduction method, while the rest funded unrelated activities.

The USDA, however, stands firm in its stance. Allan Rodriguez, a USDA spokesperson, criticized the report's findings as flawed. He defended the USDA's methodology for selecting projects for funding, which relies on scientific evidence to identify practices that truly benefit the climate. The USDA argues that the criticized practices, including livestock waste management and irrigation, are part of a broader, science-driven strategy to promote sustainability in agriculture.

Despite the controversy, the USDA remains committed to its mission of advancing agricultural practices that both sequester carbon and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The agency's strategy includes a wide array of practices, now including new measures related to livestock and irrigation management, underlining its dedication to a comprehensive approach to climate-smart farming.

Critics, however, continue to call for greater transparency and effectiveness in how these funds are allocated, pointing to the urgent need for action in the face of the climate crisis.

« Return to Home Page

Hixwood Metal
Professional Dairy Producers Foundation